Quantcast
Channel: BugNET Issue Tracker (Moved to GitHub)
Viewing all 2179 articles
Browse latest View live

Source code checked in, #dbf4a00fed62

$
0
0
updated all db scripts to use new users table

Source code checked in, #1e0d07dd73cd

$
0
0
fixed issue with stored procedure

New Post: notifications

$
0
0
Just wanting to make sure that this is the proper way for the system to work. If you change the 'Assigned To' user, it just adds them to the list of people to be notified...it does not remove the previously assigned user from the list of people to notify. Is this the correct way of working?

Thanks!

New Post: Duplicate filename with the same extension are permitted to be uploaded in one issue

$
0
0
Under Add attachment, BugNet permits uploading of duplicate files with the same filename/extension. No warning message that there is already an existing file with the same filename/extension.

New Post: Max. no. of characters displayed in History is limited

$
0
0
I see. Will be waiting for that enhancement. Or you could just display the initial sentence with link wherein when the link is click, the user will be redirected to full description. Thanks.

New Post: No Record Locking

$
0
0
I see, but hopefully, you could add this feature for security purposes in the next releases. Thanks!

Edited Unassigned: How to import tasks from an excel workbook or csv into BugNet. [265]

$
0
0
How to import tasks from an excel workbook or csv into BugNet. Kindly help me.

Commented Unassigned: Extending the Membership Provider [180]

$
0
0
My users presently have a user name and password on our DNN website. I wanted to use those existing accounts with BugNET. I wrote a membership provider that would access the DNN account information.

This seemed to work at first. I was able to log into the website using my DNN website credentials. I could update my profile. However, when I attempted to modify roles for users I quickly received an exception regarding a null UserId. After some research, it appears that the those stored procedures accept a user name and link that to the membership Users table to get the user's identification guid.

It would be a great update to change the application to use the membership provider's ProviderUserKey property in those stored procedures. That would remove the hard link to the Users table and allow others to extend the membership provider and use user names and passwords from other databases.

Dan
Comments: Closing as next release won't use the membership provider anymore.

Edited Feature: Extending the Membership Provider [180]

$
0
0
My users presently have a user name and password on our DNN website. I wanted to use those existing accounts with BugNET. I wrote a membership provider that would access the DNN account information.

This seemed to work at first. I was able to log into the website using my DNN website credentials. I could update my profile. However, when I attempted to modify roles for users I quickly received an exception regarding a null UserId. After some research, it appears that the those stored procedures accept a user name and link that to the membership Users table to get the user's identification guid.

It would be a great update to change the application to use the membership provider's ProviderUserKey property in those stored procedures. That would remove the hard link to the Users table and allow others to extend the membership provider and use user names and passwords from other databases.

Dan

New Post: how to verify a "fake" user

$
0
0
I have created some "fake" users that are more like place holders. What database table do I need to modify to indicate they are "verified" and what flag do I need to set (there is not a valid email address for these accounts)?

Basically I need to have these "fake" accounts show up in the 'Assigned To' and 'Owned By' drop down lists.


Thanks!

New Post: help! my bugnet installation is corrupt

$
0
0
I just installed the latest version of BugNET (1.6.329.0) and navigated to the home page, I got a TON of SQL errors on the upgrade page, but for some reason it's now saying 'No Upgrade needed.' and yet nothing works.

the home page gives the following error:
cedure BugNet_Project_GetAllProjects has no parameters and arguments were supplied

which presumably is because the SQL upgrade failed.

what am i supposed to do now?

where's the SQL upgrade scripts for me to apply manually?

Created Unassigned: discrepancy between fresh & updated SQL database [268]

$
0
0
I have noticed that the update file 1.6.327.0.SqlDataProvider.sql contains the following:

> CREATE NONCLUSTERED INDEX [IX_BugNet_IssueAttachments_DateCreated_IssueId]

however, the 'fresh' schema 'BugNet.Schema.SqlDataProvider.sql' does not include this index.

1) why is this missing?
2) what other discrepancies are there?
3) which version is correct?

New Post: help! my bugnet installation is corrupt

$
0
0
spongman wrote:
I just installed the latest version of BugNET (1.6.329.0) and navigated to the home page, I got a TON of SQL errors on the upgrade page, but for some reason it's now saying 'No Upgrade needed.' and yet nothing works.

the home page gives the following error:
cedure BugNet_Project_GetAllProjects has no parameters and arguments were supplied

which presumably is because the SQL upgrade failed.

what am i supposed to do now?

where's the SQL upgrade scripts for me to apply manually?
If the upgrade fails you should rollback to your previous installation and try again. Can you be more specific on the errors you received?

Commented Unassigned: discrepancy between fresh & updated SQL database [268]

$
0
0
I have noticed that the update file 1.6.327.0.SqlDataProvider.sql contains the following:

> CREATE NONCLUSTERED INDEX [IX_BugNet_IssueAttachments_DateCreated_IssueId]

however, the 'fresh' schema 'BugNet.Schema.SqlDataProvider.sql' does not include this index.

1) why is this missing?
2) what other discrepancies are there?
3) which version is correct?
Comments: There shouldn't be any other discrepancies but I will make sure that this is fixed in the next version.

Edited Unassigned: discrepancy between fresh & updated SQL database [268]

$
0
0
I have noticed that the update file 1.6.327.0.SqlDataProvider.sql contains the following:

> CREATE NONCLUSTERED INDEX [IX_BugNet_IssueAttachments_DateCreated_IssueId]

however, the 'fresh' schema 'BugNet.Schema.SqlDataProvider.sql' does not include this index.

1) why is this missing?
2) what other discrepancies are there?
3) which version is correct?

New Post: how to verify a "fake" user

$
0
0
asudman wrote:
I have created some "fake" users that are more like place holders. What database table do I need to modify to indicate they are "verified" and what flag do I need to set (there is not a valid email address for these accounts)?

Basically I need to have these "fake" accounts show up in the 'Assigned To' and 'Owned By' drop down lists.


Thanks!
That should be the Membership table with the IsApproved column.

Commented Unassigned: discrepancy between fresh & updated SQL database [268]

$
0
0
I have noticed that the update file 1.6.327.0.SqlDataProvider.sql contains the following:

> CREATE NONCLUSTERED INDEX [IX_BugNet_IssueAttachments_DateCreated_IssueId]

however, the 'fresh' schema 'BugNet.Schema.SqlDataProvider.sql' does not include this index.

1) why is this missing?
2) what other discrepancies are there?
3) which version is correct?
Comments: there are other differences. i'd recommend using a schema comparison tool (like red gate's, or VS's) to automatically generate the update scripts, otherwise future updates are going to break more existing installations.

Commented Unassigned: discrepancy between fresh & updated SQL database [268]

$
0
0
I have noticed that the update file 1.6.327.0.SqlDataProvider.sql contains the following:

> CREATE NONCLUSTERED INDEX [IX_BugNet_IssueAttachments_DateCreated_IssueId]

however, the 'fresh' schema 'BugNet.Schema.SqlDataProvider.sql' does not include this index.

1) why is this missing?
2) what other discrepancies are there?
3) which version is correct?
Comments: here's the differences i'm seeing right now... missing: > IX_BugNet_IssueAttachments_DateCreated_IssueId > IX_BugNet_IssueComments_IssueId_UserId_DateCreated > IX_BugNet_IssueHistory_IssueId_UserId_DateCreated > IX_BugNet_Issues_IssueCategoryId_ProjectId_Disabled_IssueStatusId > IX_BugNet_Issues_IssueId_ProjectId_Disabled > IX_BugNet_Issues_K12_K22_K1_K15_K9_K8_K6_K5_K7_K4_K10_K21_K11_K13_2_3_14_16_17_18_19_20 > IX_BugNet_Issues_K12_K22_K1_K15_K9_K8_K6_K5_K7_K4_K10_K21_K11_K13_2_3_14_16_17_18_19_20 and a whole bunch of statistics

Commented Unassigned: discrepancy between fresh & updated SQL database [268]

$
0
0
I have noticed that the update file 1.6.327.0.SqlDataProvider.sql contains the following:

> CREATE NONCLUSTERED INDEX [IX_BugNet_IssueAttachments_DateCreated_IssueId]

however, the 'fresh' schema 'BugNet.Schema.SqlDataProvider.sql' does not include this index.

1) why is this missing?
2) what other discrepancies are there?
3) which version is correct?
Comments: I do use visual studios schema comparison tool to generate upgrade scripts. The create script is generated using ssms and looks like it missed those. I will make sure the create script gets updated with those.

New Post: Unable to login the Account after 5 invalid password attempt

Viewing all 2179 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>