Commented Unassigned: discrepancy between fresh & updated SQL database [268]
I have noticed that the update file 1.6.327.0.SqlDataProvider.sql contains the following:> CREATE NONCLUSTERED INDEX [IX_BugNet_IssueAttachments_DateCreated_IssueId]however, the 'fresh' schema...
View ArticleNew Post: how to verify a "fake" user
That doesn't seem to be doing it. IsApproved is set to '1' and the user does not show in the lists. It appears to be something with the role assigned to the user. I have 'Assign Issues' flagged, but...
View ArticleCommented Unassigned: discrepancy between fresh & updated SQL database [268]
I have noticed that the update file 1.6.327.0.SqlDataProvider.sql contains the following:> CREATE NONCLUSTERED INDEX [IX_BugNet_IssueAttachments_DateCreated_IssueId]however, the 'fresh' schema...
View ArticleCommented Unassigned: discrepancy between fresh & updated SQL database [268]
I have noticed that the update file 1.6.327.0.SqlDataProvider.sql contains the following:> CREATE NONCLUSTERED INDEX [IX_BugNet_IssueAttachments_DateCreated_IssueId]however, the 'fresh' schema...
View ArticleNew Post: how to verify a "fake" user
asudman wrote: That doesn't seem to be doing it. IsApproved is set to '1' and the user does not show in the lists. It appears to be something with the role assigned to the user. I have 'Assign Issues'...
View ArticleNew Post: how to verify a "fake" user
asudman wrote: They are already assigned to the project. If they are assigned to the project, have a role and are approved they should show up in the assigned to lists.
View ArticleEdited Issue: discrepancy between fresh & updated SQL database [268]
I have noticed that the update file 1.6.327.0.SqlDataProvider.sql contains the following:> CREATE NONCLUSTERED INDEX [IX_BugNet_IssueAttachments_DateCreated_IssueId]however, the 'fresh' schema...
View ArticleNew Post: how to verify a "fake" user
Don't know what else to tell you. It appears to have something to do with the role assigned to the user. If I change the role it shows up, if I change it back to 'read only' it doesn't. Is there a...
View ArticleNew Post: how to verify a "fake" user
Yes , readonly users can't be assigned to issues.
View ArticleNew Post: how to verify a "fake" user
is this just a hard and fast rule for the role name, or is there a setting on the role that can be changed to have them appear?
View ArticleNew Post: how to verify a "fake" user
asudman wrote: is this just a hard and fast rule for the role name, or is there a setting on the role that can be changed to have them appear? Its a hardcoded rule, and you can modify the...
View ArticleNew Post: how to verify a "fake" user
Or I can create a new role the is a clone of 'Read Only', but with a different name. Seems safer so it doesn't get overwritten with a new release. Thanks for all the help! I wish all software providers...
View ArticleSource code checked in, #2648100d09ff
updated all objects to use new identity tables instead of profile provider
View ArticleNew Post: Inability to detect duplicate value of a Custom Field during creation
System should detect duplicate values of a Custom Field. Thanks. In addition, system also cannot detect duplicate values for the default fields in Edit Mode.
View ArticleNew Post: Inability to detect duplicate value of a Custom Field during creation
Thanks, I saw the bug you created and will add it to the roadmap to get fixed.
View ArticleSource code checked in, #f2a7984cc8ff
updated sign in to use isapproved field remnoved profile provider migrated localization module to use asp.net identity made columns smaller on profile page
View ArticleSource code checked in, #d7d616520ccf
updated registration to use verified accounts properly and updated user verification template
View ArticleNew Post: Calendar of under Creation of Milestone has no Fridays
No friday in the Calendar of Due Data and Release Date in Milestone maintenance
View Article